Towards the end of December we found out from the local Derbyshire press that the result of the planning appeal put in by ATH had been issued and that ATH had won their appeal. Not a word from Derbyshire CC planning department despite NANC having submitted a written objection to both planning committee meetings and spoken at the first one. Also I put in an on-line objection to the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol which was not acknowledged. Poor show there all round. Nor were we informed of the date of the appeal inquiry in Pinxton. At least Nottinghamshire had the courtesy to write and let me know that the appeal had been upheld, even though the appeal was not against them.
We are disappointed but not surprised that climate change did not even get a mention in the appeal decision. It was all about the lorries, which are important to the people of Pinxton but nothing about climate change despite the fact that, according to PPS1(Supplement), climate change should be at the forefront of all planning decisions. One wonders why these documents are ever printed if they are continuously ignored.
The reason for the development was to get at coal from a spoil heap and this was mentioned only once when, and I quote “There would also be the reclamation of around half a million tonnes of coal”. Excuse me but that is the reason for the application in the first place. ATH aren’t doing this out of altruistism. If the coal wasn’t in that spoil heap none of this would be happening. There would not be an issue with transport and the spoil heap would remain exactly as it is. There would be no new pathways, the flood retention capacity of the area would be the same. Everything would be the same. But it is the coal and only the coal that is leading this application and it is getting lost in arguements about lorry routes.
Using simple sums involving the relative molecular weights of carbon and carbon dioxide, NANC calculate that something around 700,000 tonnes of CO2 will be emitted from the burning of this coal. That is about 10 times the amount that Nottingham City Council produce from their buildings and vehicle fleets each year, so it is not a small amount of CO2. The inspector says that it would contribute “a very small percentage to the country’s energy minerals requirements” i.e. how much coal we use each year. Yes – a very small percentage – less than 1% in fact. It would be interesting to find out how much energy would be produced for the country if a couple of wind turbines were put there instead of the coal being extracted.
And now on to Cossall. Nothing is happeing there at the moment. What could be causing this? Several factors. I had a look at the share price of UK Coal today and it is LOW. Very LOW. And that despite the demand for energy with the cold spell. It seems the recession is causing a drop in demand for power. Add to that the death of a miner in Yorkshire recently and things aren’t looking too good for UK Coal. Shame.
NANC have had requests via our website and also face to face to put up a map of the proposed application so, via the magic that is Google Earth and information we gained by the FOI requests we made, we have downloaded a satelite photo of the area and drawn 2 outlines – the one in red is the proposed 2009 version and the one in blue is the outline of the 1995 application. You can see the M1 crossing the image diagonally from bottom left to top right with Trowell Services obvious as a diamond shape either side of the motorway surrounded on the west of the motorway by proposed excavations. That is certainly going to affect their business. Would you stop for a cuppa with that going on around you?